Gamification: Tactics and Strategies that Exacerbate Inequalities on ‘Online Social Media Platforms’

Abstract

In the era of digital capitalism, the growth hacking industry has emerged as a key player in driving the rapid expansion of social media platforms. Growth hackers employ a diverse range of tactics to optimise user acquisition, retention, and engagement. However, while these strategies are often celebrated for their innovation and scalability, they have inadvertently contributed to exacerbating inequalities, both economic and social, through the culture of the “hustle.” This article critically examines the intersection of growth hacking, social media platforms, and inequality, highlighting how the hustle culture perpetuates exclusionary dynamics. By investigating the tactics employed by growth hackers and analysing their social, economic, and cultural impacts, this article explores the mechanisms by which these practices deepen existing disparities, particularly in terms of access to resources, mental health, and socio-economic mobility.

Introduction

The global proliferation of social media platforms in the 21st century has reshaped nearly every facet of social, economic, and political life. As the digital realm becomes increasingly intertwined with everyday existence, the notion of growth hacking has become a central pillar in the expansion strategies of tech companies, particularly within the social media industry. Growth hackers, driven by data analytics, algorithmic manipulation, and viral marketing techniques, aim to achieve exponential growth at minimal cost. This rapid scaling, often glorified within the context of Silicon Valley’s entrepreneurial ethos, is a defining feature of the contemporary “hustle culture.”

However, beneath the surface of the hustle culture lies a deeper, more insidious reality. Despite its purported egalitarian benefits, the hustle culture perpetuates systemic inequalities, particularly in the digital age. Growth hacking strategies, which prioritise metrics like user engagement and virality, have resulted in practices that disproportionately benefit those with pre-existing access to resources while marginalising others. This article examines the tactics employed by growth hackers and the ways in which they exacerbate digital inequalities through user data exploitation, algorithmic biases, and the normalisation of hustle culture as an economic and social norm.

The Rise of Growth Hacking in the Digital Economy

Growth hacking, originally coined by Sean Ellis in 2010, refers to a set of marketing strategies aimed at achieving rapid growth through innovative, data-driven, and often unconventional techniques. Unlike traditional marketing, growth hacking is intensely focused on optimising key performance indicators (KPIs), such as user acquisition, retention, and virality, often at the expense of long-term sustainability or ethical considerations. Growth hackers exploit user data to craft strategies that encourage users to engage with content more frequently, thereby ensuring that platforms capture a larger share of users’ attention and time.

The centrality of growth hacking to the business models of social media platforms can be traced to the financial incentives driving these companies. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter are built upon the premise of monetising user attention through advertisements. To maximize profit, these platforms rely on techniques that enhance user engagement and encourage users to spend more time on their sites. Growth hackers employ strategies such as gamification, viral marketing, referral programs, and algorithmic content curation to accelerate user acquisition and interaction. While these tactics have proven effective in terms of business growth, they have profound social implications that exacerbate inequality.

Tactics and Strategies that Contribute to Inequality

1. Exploitation of User Data and the Digital Divide

Growth hackers rely heavily on data analytics to optimise platform performance. User data, including personal preferences, behaviours, and social networks, are harvested to craft personalised experiences that maximise engagement. This form of surveillance capitalism has been critiqued for its invasive nature, but it also contributes to exacerbating inequalities, particularly in the context of access to digital tools and resources.

Users with greater access to advanced digital infrastructure—such as high-speed internet, personal devices, and digital literacy—are more likely to engage in growth-hacking strategies like social media marketing, content creation, and influencer culture. Meanwhile, marginalized groups, including lower-income individuals, people in rural areas, and those with limited digital skills, are systematically excluded from these digital economies. The digital divide becomes more pronounced as growth hackers optimise content based on data patterns that do not account for the experiences or needs of these underrepresented communities.

2. Algorithmic Bias and Exclusionary Practices

Algorithms are at the heart of growth hacking strategies, dictating what content is visible to users and when. These algorithms are often designed to prioritise content that has already been proven to generate high engagement, such as posts from influencers or viral trends. While these algorithms are presented as neutral, they are inherently biased toward content that aligns with the interests and behaviors of already privileged groups.

Research has shown that social media algorithms often disproportionately favor content created by individuals who are already established within the platform’s ecosystem, such as influencers, celebrities, or brands with large followings. As a result, newcomers or creators from marginalised backgrounds—who may lack the same resources to drive engagement—are often relegated to lower visibility or exclusion from platform algorithms altogether. The hyper-competitive nature of these platforms, driven by growth hacking strategies, fosters an environment where only a select few can “hustle” their way to success, perpetuating a cycle of inequality.

3. Normalisation of Hustle Culture and Mental Health Impacts

The hustle culture, fueled by the growth hacking mentality, places immense pressure on individuals to constantly “hustle” for success, often at the cost of mental health and well-being. Social media platforms, through their constant emphasis on productivity and achievement, create an environment where individuals are encouraged to be perpetually active and engaged, constantly seeking new opportunities to grow their influence and audience.

This culture can be especially harmful to marginalised individuals, who may already face social and economic stressors in their offline lives. The pressure to “hack” growth, to always be productive, and to keep pushing boundaries can lead to burnout, anxiety, and feelings of inadequacy. Moreover, the glorification of “overnight success” stories often masks the structural inequalities that prevent equal access to these opportunities, creating a culture where failure is seen as an individual shortcoming rather than a systemic issue.

4. Monetisation and the Exploitation of Labour

Growth hackers often exploit the unpaid labour of users to drive platform growth. Through referral programs, user-generated content, and influencer marketing, social media platforms rely on individuals to promote and spread content, often without offering fair compensation. This is particularly evident in the gig economy, where creators and influencers—many of whom are young and from marginalised backgrounds—are expected to “hustle” to build their personal brands and attract sponsorships.

While some individuals can parlay this unpaid labor into paid opportunities, the vast majority are left to fend for themselves, often exploiting their own time, resources, and mental health in the process. The promise of financial success through hustle culture often obscures the reality that only a few, typically those with existing privilege or access to capital, are able to reap the rewards of this labor.

Conclusion: Toward a More Equitable Digital Ecosystem

Growth hacking, when viewed through the lens of social inequality, reveals a troubling dynamic: the very strategies designed to optimize platform growth contribute to deepening existing societal divides. While growth hacking has undoubtedly revolutionised the digital economy, its focus on metrics-driven success has marginalised vulnerable groups and perpetuated a culture of hustle that is inaccessible to many. As social media platforms continue to shape the future of work and society, it is imperative to reconsider the ethics and social consequences of growth hacking strategies.

To address these inequalities, growth hackers, platform designers, and policymakers must consider how their strategies and algorithms can be made more inclusive. By prioritising accessibility, mitigating algorithmic biases, and fostering a digital culture that values well-being over constant productivity, we can create a more equitable online ecosystem. Until these changes are made, the hustle culture, fuelled by growth hacking, will continue to disproportionately benefit the already privileged while leaving others behind.

References

American Psychological Association. (2021). The impact of social media on mental health: A report on user anxiety. American Psychological Association.

Eubanks, V. (2019). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2020). The exploitation of gig workers: An economic analysis of the digital labor economy. International Labour Organization.

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2020). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2020. International Telecommunication Union.

Zhao, Y., Zhang, C., & Yang, J. (2020). Digital divide and growth hacking: Impact of data-driven strategies on social media access. Telecommunications Policy, 44(5), 102123.